Same-Day Analysis
Large Increase Seen in Polish Expenditure on Cancer Treatment in 2004–09; New Reimbursement List to Be Implemented in H1 2010
Published: 3/1/2010
IHS Global Insight Perspective | |
Significance | Expenditure on cancer treatments has increased by almost 200% over the past five years in Poland, with spending on oncology drugs and preventative programmes growing at a dynamic rate. Meanwhile, a new update to the drug reimbursement list in Poland is due to be introduced in the first half of 2010. |
Implications | Rather than taking great strides forward, Poland's healthcare authorities have brought the country into line with the level of expenditure on cancer treatments of comparable countries. The announcement of the introduction of a new reimbursement list in the first half of 2010 confirms that the legislative changes needed to make it possible to update the list every quarter—as is required under Polish law—have not yet been introduced. |
Outlook | The development of the situation for cancer treatments in Poland gives cause for both celebration and concern, with restrictions on access to innovative drugs and limited reimbursement approvals of innovative drugs for reimbursement expected to continue in the foreseeable future. Although the ministry of health is in talks with producers of innovative drugs, with the aim of securing lower prices for the Polish market so that their drugs can be reimbursed, it is unlikely that there will be a surfeit of new innovative drugs appearing on the updated reimbursement list when it is finally introduced. |
Annual expenditure on cancer treatments under the Polish national health system has increased dynamically in the past few years, from an estimated 1.4 billion zloty (US$484.8 million) in 2004, to 3.4 billion zloty in 2009, reports Polish newspaper Rzeczpospolita. This represents an increase in annual expenditure on cancer treatment of 183% over this period.
Although Poland has traditionally been among the countries with the lowest expenditure on cancer treatments, in the past few years, the country has made up some ground, believes Janusz Meder, head of the Polish Oncology Union, quoted by Rzeczpospolita. Meder points to data concerning cancer treatment in 2009, which show that 37% of men and 45% of women suffering from a form of cancer were treated, in comparison with only around one-third of cancer patients receiving treatment several years ago.
Meanwhile, Zbigniew Pawlowicz, director of the Oncology Centre in Bydgoszcz, told the source that around one-third of operations on breast cancer patients are carried out on women with small tumours, without metastases, whereas several years ago, this was only a small number. Pawlowicz also highlighted the improvements in the equipment and treatment methods for cancer in the past few years. There is praise from doctors for the National Programme for the Prevention of Cancer, which has invested around 250 million zloty each year in preventative activities and the purchase of radiotherapy equipment, among other things, since its inception several years ago.
Major Increase in Investment in Chemotherapy and Expensive Oncology Drugs
Investment in chemotherapy has increased by an estimated 508.6% between 2004 and 2009, when the estimated total investment in this area in Poland reached 1.236 billion zloty. There has also been a major increase in expenditure on the most expensive oncology drugs, with the Polish National Health Fund (NFZ) estimating that expenditure on health programmes (the Polish version of clinical pathways) increased by 369.3% from 2004 to 2009, to reach 502.2 million zloty.
Expenditure on Cancer Treatment Under Polish National Health System, 2004–2009 | |||
Area of Treatment | Expenditure in 2004 | Expenditure in 2009 | % Change |
Chemotherapy in hospitals | 203.1 | 1,236.0 | 508.6 |
Health programmes (clinical pathways)* | 107.0 | 502.2 | 369.3 |
Breast cancer prevention | 20.4 | 80.7 | 289.9 |
Cervical cancer prevention | 9.9 | 22.9 | 131.3 |
Haematology | 153.6 | 203.6 | 32.6 |
* Includes expenditure on the most expensive oncology drugs; data provided by the NFZ | |||
Positive and Negative Reasons for Increase in Cancer Treatment Expenditure
According to the Polish Oncology Union's Meder, quoted by Rzeczpospolita, although improvements in methods of treatment, advances in technology, and more spending on expensive drugs are important reasons for the increase in expenditure on cancer treatment in the Polish healthcare system, an equally important and less positive reason is the increased incidence of cancer among Poles. It is estimated that within the next 10–15 years, the number of cancer sufferers in Poland will double, a prediction that is connected with the longer life expectancy of Poles.
New Reimbursement List Due to Be Introduced in H1 2010
In the meantime, the Polish ministry of health (MoH) is preparing a new reimbursement list, which should be introduced within the first half of 2010, according to Polish deputy health minister Marek Twardowski, reported by Polish internet portal Wirtualna Polska. Twardowski is quoted by the source as saying that the Polish MoH is in negotiation with pharmaceutical companies, with the aim of reducing the price of certain medicines, so that new innovative treatments can be introduced onto the list.
Outlook and Implications
Poland's expenditure on cancer treatment is catching up with other comparable countries in Europe, rather than making any great strides forward; recent decisions by the Polish MoH concerning cancer treatments have included some positive ones, such as the inclusion of U.K. pharma major GlaxoSmithKline's Tyverb/Tykerb (lapatinib), and Swiss pharmaceutical giant Roche's chemotherapy drug Xeloda (capecitabine) in the therapeutic programme for breast cancer. There have also been some negative decisions too, such as the MoH's unwillingness to reimburse the Celgene (U.S.) multiple myeloma treatment Revlimid (lenalidomide), even under the appropriate therapeutic programme (see Poland: 5 February 2010: Four New Innovative Drugs Included in Therapeutic Programmes in Poland and Poland: 12 February 2010: Polish MoH's Revlimid Stance Criticised; New Direction on Non-Standard Chemotherapy Announced as Efient Reimbursement Application Rejected). There is a general perception in Poland that the MoH and the NFZ are unwilling to reimburse expensive cancer drugs on a general basis, and the restriction of their reimbursement to therapeutic programmes—managed entirely from hospitals—means that access to these medicines is more restricted than it might be; although there have been some signals that therapeutic programmes may be extended beyond hospitals, there has so far been no concrete action in this regard.
Meanwhile, the announcement that there will be an update to the drug reimbursement list in Poland in the first half of the year shows that although the new amendments planned to be introduced to the Polish law on pharmaceuticals are expected to make it easier to make changes in the reimbursement list, these amendments are still far from being introduced; until they are, updates to the reimbursement list look set to be made infrequently, and not every quarter, as is actually stipulated in Polish law. There have been mixed messages regarding the amount of money that will be available to the NFZ for drug reimbursement in 2010, although it is fairly clear that it will not be a year in which there will be a proliferation of new innovative drugs on the Polish drug reimbursement list (see Poland: 15 January 2010: Three Kidney Cancer Treatments Given Negative Recommendations in Poland, NFZ's Drug Budget Cut by US$142.9 mil.). It remains to be seen what success the Polish MoH will have in persuading innovative drug producers to reduce their prices, and how long the negotiations will take.Most Viewed Articles
- Key US Data Releases and Events
- US January Employment Report Is Far Stronger Than Expected
- Global Economic Impact of the Japanese Earthquake, Tsunami, and Nuclear Disaster
- Preliminary Figures on Russian 2011 GDP Growth Surprise on the Upside
- Argentina Shows Mixed Response to Falklands Tensions
- Key US Data Releases and Events
- EU Member States Agree On Fiscal Treaty; UK and Czech Republic Refuse to Sign
- Fitch's Six Rating Downgrades Spare Triple-AAA Euro Sovereigns But Highlight Restricted Reserve Currency Benefits
- Bank of England Policy Decision Heads up UK Economic Week for the Commencing 6 February
- Deal Signed on Burgas-Alexandroupolis Pipeline; Construction to Begin in 2008
United States













