Same-Day Analysis
Porsche Asks Court to Throw Out VW Shareholder's Case, Former CEO Partially Exonerated
Published: 9/1/2010
IHS Global Insight Perspective | |
Significance | Porsche is asking the New York court hearing the case of hedge fund companies into alleged share price manipulation of Volkswagen (VW) stock to throw the case out due to a lack of jurisdiction. Meanwhile, the Stuttgart prosecutor's office has partially exonerated Porsche's former manager Wendelin Wiedeking on related charges of insider trading. |
Implications | The management of VW wants these legal cases to go away as they are a distraction from the company's plans to smoothly integrate the sports carmaker as the tenth brand in the Group's portfolio. The company also wants to avoid having to make a substantial damages payment to the hedge funds which could run into the billions of dollars. |
Outlook | If both cases are dropped it will mean the final line under the tumultuous takeover attempt of VW by Porsche will have been drawn, nearly exactly five years after it began. If Wiedeking and Härter are cleared it may pave the way for the men to return to the industry, but this is unlikely given the status and management style of Wiedeking in particular. |
Porsche is looking to draw a line under the ongoing legal wrangling concerning the company's dealings in Volkswagen (VW) shares during its abortive takeover attempt by asking the U.S. court to dismiss the case brought by disgruntled shareholders on technical grounds. According to a Dow Jones Report the Porsche holding company, Porsche Automobil Holding SE, which was the vehicle used to acquire VW shares and cash-settled options, will formally ask the New York court hearing the case brought by United States-based shareholders to throw the case out as it does not regard the court as having legal authority over the dispute. Porsche will make the request following a legal precedent that is seemingly relevant to the case that was established in the United States earlier in the year. In June the U.S. highest judicial authority, the Supreme Court, ruled that the country's Exchange Act did not apply to foreign stocks traded on foreign exchanges. This ruling originally came in a lawsuit against National Australia Bank, with the court further decreeing that investors buying shares in foreign companies outside the United States cannot claim for damages in the United States in the event of alleged legal irregularities (see United States: 28 June 2010: Ruling May Halt U.S. Hedge Fund Legal Action Against Porsche).
The case against Porsche was brought by a group of U.S. investors mainly comprising hedge funds that lost a combined figure in the billions when Porsche revealed to the markets that it has a much larger share of VW shares under its control than had been anticipated by other shareholders. Through the use of cash-settled share options, Porsche announced in October 2008 that it controlled 74.1% of VW's total stock, holding 42.6% of its stock in wholly owned shares with a remaining 31.5% under its control in the form of cash-settled options. German stock market regulations did not require Porsche to disclose to the market the number of cash-settled options it controlled. As a result hedge funds which had chosen to "short" VW shares in the hope that their value would go down were left to buy a small pool of available shares of around 6% of the company's overall stock as they scrabbled to cover these positions. The resulting squeeze on VW shares saw the company's stock price rocket to a high of 1,005 euro, approximately 15 times higher than its natural level. A BBC story in the immediate aftermath of the VW share spike put the combined losses ion the hedge funds at around US$28 billion, although this figure is at the upper end of the scale of estimates.
Meanwhile in a separate development, Stuttgart prosecutors investigating claims of share manipulation has partially exonerated the architects of the aborted Porsche takeover of VW, the company's former chief executive Wendelin Wiedeking and firm's chief financial officer Holger Härter. According to a Handelsblatt report, the prosecutors did not see enough evidence to continue the current investigation into insider trading. However, a spokesperson for the prosecutors office said that the authorities would decide by the end of the year whether to persist in the investigation against the former Porsche managers for stock exchange manipulation.
Outlook and Implications
As history records the vaulting ambition of Wiedeking and Härter's plan to take over Europe's largest carmaker faltered as a result of banks and financial institutions losing confidence in Porsche's ability to complete the deal in the wake of the global credit crisis. The economic downturn meant that the company's lenders would not sanction releasing the funds to complete the takeover and the drop-off in premium car sales during the period meant that Porsche's core business was no longer generating sufficient cash to underpin further borrowing. In the end of Porsche had to unwind its share options in VW and an effective reverse takeover was agreed with VW taking a 49.9% stake in Porsche AG. The company will officially become the VW Group's tenth brand in 2011 when the takeover is officially completed. VW's executive and supervisory board will be keen to get any further legal complications out of the way so that the full integration process can be completed without over threat of a settlement running into the billions of euro for the hedge funds looming. This will depend on the New York Court agreeing with Porsche's lawyers that the United States has no legal jurisdiction over the case. The legal precedent from the Supreme Court appears clear but it remains to be seen if the court will decide in Porsche's favour. Even if it this is the case the U.S. hedge funds involved in the case may still opt to pursue a case through the German courts, although this may become less likely if Wiedeking and Härter are fully cleared of the allegations of insider trading and market manipulation. If they are fully cleared it could pave the way for both men to return to the automotive industry in the future. The enormous settlements both men received as part of their severance deals caused controversy in Germany (see Germany: 24 June 2010: Wiedeking's 50-mil.-Euro Settlement Criticised Despite Half Going to Charity) and there is little prospect of both men being lured back by money. But they may feel they have unfinished business in the industry, but in truth, despite Wiedeking's massive list of accomplishments during his tenure at Porsche, including his feat of turning the company into the most profitable car company in the world, on balance it is unlikely that he will make a return to the industry. His autocratic and idiosyncratic management style would be unlikely to sit well with the existing management structures of other German OEMs. In that respect Porsche was the perfect vehicle for his singular talents. However, it is possible that he may look to branch out into other industry roles if he gets bored with retirement.Most Viewed Articles
- Key US Data Releases and Events
- US January Employment Report Is Far Stronger Than Expected
- Global Economic Impact of the Japanese Earthquake, Tsunami, and Nuclear Disaster
- Preliminary Figures on Russian 2011 GDP Growth Surprise on the Upside
- Argentina Shows Mixed Response to Falklands Tensions
- Key US Data Releases and Events
- EU Member States Agree On Fiscal Treaty; UK and Czech Republic Refuse to Sign
- Fitch's Six Rating Downgrades Spare Triple-AAA Euro Sovereigns But Highlight Restricted Reserve Currency Benefits
- Bank of England Policy Decision Heads up UK Economic Week for the Commencing 6 February
- Deal Signed on Burgas-Alexandroupolis Pipeline; Construction to Begin in 2008
United States













